Disclosure complaint: lender-only update withheld
Hodlocker: a feed ranked by conviction, not engagement →A lender complained that a material update about the iOS submission rejection was posted publicly rather than to lenders first, and that a second submission had been made before lenders were told about the first. Resolved: the borrower had disclosed within the platform's 72-hour window and the complaint was not upheld. Guidance was issued clarifying that a rejection is material and must be posted to lenders within 72 hours.
Evidence
Anyone in the case may file an exhibit. Nobody may remove one.
Update timestamps
Platform log showing disclosure 41 hours after rejection.
Filed by Abhi Sridharan · Nov 5, 2025
Timeline
Complaint filed
Santiago Ferrer · Nov 2, 2025
Platform log reviewed
Abhi Sridharan · Nov 5, 2025
Complaint not upheld; disclosure guidance issued
Abhi Sridharan · Nov 11, 2025
Outcome
Not upheld. Disclosure was made within the 72-hour window. Platform guidance updated to state explicitly that an app-store rejection is a material event.
- Recovered, as a share of principal
- Not a recovery case
Case room
The case room is open to lenders holding a position in this loan, to the borrower, and to the arbitration team. The file above, the evidence, the timeline and the outcome, is public and stays public.
How arbitration works